Alibaba, Ant Face Crackdowns From Chinese Regulators — Wall Street Journal
By Liza Lin, Lingling Wei and Chong Koh Ping, Dec. 24, 2020 6:42 am ET
China is coming down hard on one of its biggest and most powerful business empires.
On Thursday, Chinese regulators said they were taking action against billionaire Jack Maâ€™s two crown jewels, e-commerce giant Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and finance behemoth Ant Group, moves that followed the abrupt shutdown last month of Antâ€™s planned blockbuster public listing.
In a terse statement Thursday, Beijingâ€™s top market regulator, the State Administration for Market Regulation, said it had launched an antitrust investigation into Alibaba. Separately, a joint statement issued by Chinaâ€™s central bank and regulatory agencies overseeing securities, banking and insurance said they would meet with Ant to urge the firm to implement financial regulations and other rules.
Taken together, the actions mark Beijingâ€™s strongest enforcement action against a technology empire that has come to embody Chinaâ€™s striking riseâ€”and its founder Mr. Ma, a flamboyant celebrity businessman who has earned comparisons to Amazon.com Inc.â€™s Jeff Bezos.
The effort underscores Beijingâ€™s resolve to rein in technology giants seen to be growing too quickly and, critics say, using their influence in ways that are reckless and disruptive to society.
Government investigators arrived at Alibabaâ€™s Hangzhou campus on Thursday morning, according to people familiar with the matter. Alibaba and SAMR didnâ€™t respond to requests for comment on the investigators.
The countryâ€™s antimonopoly regulator said in its statement Thursday that it was acting on reports that Alibaba was pressuring merchants who sell goods on its platforms to commit to not selling on its competitorsâ€™ platforms.
The practice has long been a bone of contention in Chinaâ€™s online retail industry, where Alibabaâ€™s e-commerce platforms, Taobao and Tmall, compete with JD.com Inc. and Pinduoduo Inc. Alibabaâ€™s domestic rivals have criticized the Hangzhou-based company for the practice, which a former senior Alibaba executive called â€œstandard market practiceâ€ in a social media post last year.
Alibaba and Ant confirmed in separate statements that they had received notifications of the regulatory actions, and vowed to cooperate. Alibaba said that its businesses are operating as usual, while Ant said it would â€œseriously study and strictly comply with all regulatory requirements.â€
Mr. Ma couldn’t be reached for comment. He hasnâ€™t appeared publicly since he criticized financial regulators for stifling innovation in an Oct. 24 speech that infuriated leader Xi Jinping and other senior officials. Mr. Xi personally instructed regulators to investigate risks posed by Mr. Maâ€™s business and to shut down Antâ€™s planned initial public offering.
JD.com and Pinduoduo didnâ€™t reply to requests for comment.
Alibaba shares closed 8.1% lower in Hong Kong, while JD.com declined 2.3%. Alibabaâ€™s rival Tencent Holdings Ltd.â€”which some investors believe could also get drawn into a broader regulatory crackdownâ€”retreated 2.6% amid a slight gain in the broader stock market.
Regulators are zeroing in on whether Alipay, Antâ€™s payments platform, or other corners of Mr. Maâ€™s business empire have crossed the line into monopolistic behavior, according to a Chinese official with knowledge of the probes.
Alipay, in particular, has caught regulatorsâ€™ attention because it possesses a wealth of data on the spending habits of hundreds of millions of Chinese consumers and businesses. The payments platform, housed under Ant, processed more than 118 trillion yuan, equivalent to $18 trillion, worth of transactions in mainland China in the year ended June 30.
Regulators are also worried that Antâ€™s online-lending modelâ€”which makes unsecured credit available to consumers and small businesses onlineâ€”could potentially trigger â€œsystemic risksâ€ for Chinaâ€™s financial system, the official said.
Last month, Beijing pulled the plug on Antâ€™s planned IPO in Hong Kong and Shanghai, which was set to raise $34 billion in the biggest stock-market debut in history. Authorities also released draft regulations that would force the company to cough up more of its own capital to support its lending operations, or scale them back.
Since then, senior Chinese leaders have spoken publicly about limiting the market power of Chinese firms. Authorities also introduced new draft antitrust laws to restrict internet companiesâ€™ data collection and use, and measures to protect consumers.
The actions taken Thursday show that Beijingâ€™s campaign to tighten oversight of domestic technology companies is still gathering steam.
The Chinese Communist Partyâ€™s flagship newspaper, the Peopleâ€™s Daily, wrote in a commentary Thursday that the new actions didnâ€™t mean the state had changed its views toward encouraging the development of the internet platforms. But the commentary said that the actions were made â€œprecisely to better regulate and develop the platform economy and to guide and promote its healthy development.â€ It said: â€œWithout rules, nothing can be done.â€
Chinese internet firms have traditionally been allowed unfettered growth at home, as Beijing sought to develop its own national technology champions. Founded in 1999, Alibaba is perhaps the most powerful conglomerate of all, with business lines spanning e-commerce sites, cloud-computing services, entertainment and logistics. Alibaba and Tencent have long traded places as Asiaâ€™s most valuable company by market capitalization.
The recent moves by Beijing to tighten the reins on Alibaba and its peers put it, in one sense, into closer alignment with global regulators. In the U.S., where Facebook Inc. and Google parent Alphabet Inc. are facing antitrust cases, Silicon Valley executives argue that breaking up its giants would leave it vulnerable to competition by Chinaâ€™s tech giants. The current wave of actions could narrow that gap.
â€œChina wants to get out in front, rather than deal later, with more hardened consequences, as the U.S. is struggling to do,â€ said Peter Fuhrman, Shenzhen-based chief executive officer of China First Capital, an investment bank. â€œA concern would be that market power may potentially morph into political power.â€
At the same time, any new regulatory oversight of the tech giants will likely be seen as part of Mr. Xiâ€™s attempt to assert even more political control over the economy. He has sought to bring to heel private entrepreneurs and has talked regularly of needs to bolster government-run companies in key sectors such as finance.
In many ways, Ant acts like a financial institution by facilitating loans between banks and users of its ubiquitous Alipay payments appâ€”used by one billion people in Chinaâ€”but it isnâ€™t regulated like one. Its business model is structured in such a way that has been able to lure borrowers away from traditional lenders, while leaving the banks with the credit risk.