In recent years, a large percentage of all OTCBB IPOs have been for Chinese SME companies. This is largely because too many Chinese SME fall too easily into the pit of investment vipers â€“ the lawyers, accountants and self-described â€œinvestment bankersâ€ and â€œprivate equity investorsâ€ that promote these OTCBB listings, reverse mergers and other schemes concocted by advisors generally for their own self-enrichment.
Once caught in the trap, the prospects for the SME are generally pretty bleak. Theyâ€™ll be bled of badly-needed cash to pay the advisors, bankers and lawyers their fees, and later, by the costs of remaining a listed company. The bosses come to learn that a â€œUS IPOâ€ isnâ€™t at all what itâ€™s cracked up to be when it takes place on OTCBB: there are no celebratory news reports, no huge sums flowing into their personal or corporate bank accounts, no boost in company prestige or brand awareness. At best, it turns out to be a very expensive lesson. At worst, itâ€™s the transaction that leads to the companyâ€™s premature demise.
Of course, by the time the SME realizes the scale of the mistake it made by agreeing to IPO on OTCBB, the advisors, lawyers and bankers are all long gone. Iâ€™ve heard from a Chinese lawyer friend that these advisors will change their mobile phone numbers after the IPO so the SME boss can no longer contact them.
Indeed, the distinguishing characteristic of these advisors and bankers is their disregard for the future condition of the Chinese SMEs once theyâ€™ve done the OTCBB transaction. They have no stake in the long-term success of the company, because they cash out at IPO, and move onto their next victim, er client.
It is not unusual that advisors earn millions of dollars from these OTCBB deals. It may be the most successful and durable investment banking racket of all time. Hundreds of Chinese companies have been ensnared over the last seven years.
How has it gone on for so long? For one thing, the OTCBB is not regulated in any real sense of the word. So, the SEC has little or no power to crack-down. The larger factor, though, is the complete lack of adequate scrutiny by the Chinese SME bosses. They put their businessâ€™s future in the hands of a bunch of guys with a proven talent (and mile-long rap sheets) for destroying companies, not building them.
Iâ€™m constantly amazed that great Chinese SME bosses Iâ€™ve met will do no independent due diligence on financial advisors. They donâ€™t ask for a full track record of past deals, or partner bios, or a list of satisfied past customers to consult. Everything is taken at face value, and appropriately enough, the common result is a very large loss of face for the Chinese boss, after these bad deals have closed, and the damage is calculated.
Even if a Chinese boss wanted to do some proper due diligence, itâ€™s by no means simple. Thereâ€™s a notable lack of good, current information about the OTCBB in Chinese. Chinese journalists donâ€™t ever seem to write about it, perhaps because these IPOs take place outside China. I did a search of OTCBB on Chinaâ€™s main search engine, Baidu.com, and the top results included information thatâ€™s three to four years old, and a site called OTCBB.com.cn that offers very little information, and seems to be owned and run by the kind of advisory firm that specializes in (you guessed it) doing OTCBB listings of Chinese companies. You wonâ€™t find anything too useful here.
It doesnâ€™t take a lot of digging, assuming one can speak some English and knows where to look, to discover information that should start alarm bells ringing loud enough to wake the dead. For example, the Chinese government doesnâ€™t recognize the OTCBB as a legitimate stock market for many transactions. Hereâ€™s a kernel of disclosure language from the SEC filing of a Chinese company that listed on OTCBB. (Underlined for emphasis:)
â€œThe stock portion of the purchase price of Weihe to Weiheâ€™s stockholders because the delivery of shares of the Companyâ€™s common stock in connection with the acquisition of Weihe is not permitted pursuant to applicable PRC law, so long as the Company is listed and traded on the OTCBB, rather than an exchange recognized by the applicable PRC governmental authorities, such as Nasdaq, AMEX and the NYSE.â€
Imagine for a second youâ€™re a lawyer, working with a Chinese SME on a proposed OTCBB listing. You must know this fact, that the Chinese government doesnâ€™t recognize that stock market as legitimate. What do you do? Do you exercise your duty-of-care, and tell the client of the danger of an OTCBB listing? Or, do you just gloss over it, so that the deal will go through and youâ€™ll earn big legal fees?
No prizes for guessing which course many of the lawyers take who advise Chinese SME on OTCBB listing. This is why itâ€™s not, in my mind, exaggerating to say that these advisors are often a disgrace to their professions.
What can be done about all of this? Itâ€™s already too late for hundreds of Chinese companies that went down this road. For the other thousands of good SME bosses, however, access to better information in Chinese is obviously going to be important, to give them a solid basis to decide which kind of capital markets transaction to pursue.
Iâ€™ve done my share lately of cursing the darkness in this blog, remonstrating against the advisors, lawyers and bankers whoâ€™ve grown rich off promoting OTCBB and Pink Sheet listings, reverse mergers and SPAC deals. Itâ€™s time I also lit a candle.
Together with my colleagues at China First Capital, weâ€™ve been working on a Chinese-language publication called â€œå¦‚ä½•é€‰æ‹©ä¸Šå¸‚çš„æ—¶æœºå’Œåœ°ç‚¹â€ or â€œWhen and Where to IPOâ€. It discusses at some length the problems with listing on OTCBB, or doing other kinds of rushed IPOs.
Weâ€™ll be completing it this week, and once done, weâ€™ll do our utmost to make it as widely available as possible, in print and online.