Hands down, it is the worst investment idea in the private equity industry today: to buy all shares of a Chinese company trading in the US stock market, take it private, and then try to re-list the company in China.Â Several such deals have already been hatched, including one by Bain Capital thatâ€™s now in the early stages, the planned buyout of NASDAQ-quoted Harbin Electric (with PE financing provided by Abax Capital) and a takeover completed by Chinese conglomerate Fosun.
From what I can gather, quite a few other PE firms are now actively looking at similar transactions. While the superficial appeal of such deals is clear, the risks are enormous, unmanageable and have the potential to mortally would any PE firm reckless enough to try.
A bad investment idea often starts from some simple math. In this case, itâ€™s the fact there are several hundred Chinese companies quoted in the US on the OTCBB or AMEX with stunningly low valuations, often just three to four times their earnings.Â That means an investor can buy all the traded shares at a low overall price, and then, in partnership with the controlling shareholders,Â move the company to a more friendly stock market, where valuations of companies of a similar size trade at 20-30 times profits.
Sounds easy, doesnâ€™t it? Itâ€™s anything but. Start with the fact that those low valuations in the US may not only be the result of unappreciative or uncomprehending American investors. Any Chinese company foolish enough to list on the OTCBB, or do any other sort of reverse merger, is probably suffering other less obvious afflictions. One certainty:Â that the boss had little knowledge of capital markets and took few sensible precautions before pulling the trigger on the backdoor listing which, among its other curses, likely cost the Chinese company at least one million dollars to complete, including subsequent listing and compliance costs.
Why would any PE firm, investing as a fiduciary, want to go in business with a boss like this? An â€œundervalued assetâ€ in the control of a guy misguided enough to go public on the OTCBB may not be in any way undervalued.
Next, the complexities of taking a company private in the US. Thereâ€™s no fixed price. But, itâ€™s not a simple matter of tendering for the shares at a price high enough to induce shareholders to sell. The legal burden, and so legal costs, are fearsome. Worse, lots can â€“ and often will â€“ go wrong, in ways that no PE firm can predict or control. The most obvious one here is that the PE firm, along with the Chinese company, get targeted by a class action lawsuit.
These are common enough in any kind of M&A deal in the US. When the deal involves a cash-rich PE firm and a Chinese company with questionable management abilities, it becomes a high likelihood event. Contingency law-firms will be salivating. They know the PE firm has the cash to pay a rich settlement, even if the Chinese company is a total dog. Legal fees to defend a class action lawsuit can run into tens of millions of dollars. Settling costs less, but targets you for other opportunistic lawsuits that keep the legal bills piling up.
The PE firm itself ends up spending more time in court in the US than investing in China. I doubt this is the preferred career path for the partners of these PE firms. Bain Capital may be able to scare off or fight off the tort lawyers. But, other PE firms, without Bain’s experience, capital and in-house lawyers in the US, will not be so fortunate. Instead, think lambs to slaughter.
Also waiting to explode, the possibility of an SEC investigationï¼Œor maybe jail time. Will the PE firm really be able to control the Chinese companyâ€™s boss from tipping off friends, who then begin insider trading? The whole process of â€œbringing privateâ€ requires the PE firm to conspire together, in secret, with the boss of the US-quoted Chinese company toÂ tender forÂ shares later at a premium to current price. That boss, almost certainly a Chinese citizen, can work out pretty quickly that even if he breaks SEC insider trading rules, by talking up the deal before itâ€™s publicly disclosed, thereâ€™s no risk of him being extradited to the US. In other words, lucrative crime without punishment.
The PE firmâ€™s partners, on the other hand, are not likely immune. Some will likely be US passport or Green Card holders. Or, as likely, they have raised money from US institutions. In either case, they will have a much harder time evading the long arm of US justice. Even if they do, the publicity will likely render them Â â€œpersona non grataâ€ in the US, and so unable to raise additional funds there.
Such LP risk â€“ that the PE firm will be so disgraced by the transaction with the US-quoted Chinese company that theyâ€™ll be unable in the future to raise funds in the US â€“ is both large and uncontrollable. The potential returns for doing these “delist-relist” deals Â arenâ€™t anywhere close to commensurate with that risk. Leaving aside the likelihood of expensive lawsuits or SEC action, there is a fundamental flaw in these plans.
It is far from certain that these Chinese companies, once taken private, will be able to relist in China. Without this â€œexitâ€, the economics of the deal are, at best, weak. Yes, the Chinese company can promise the PE firm to buy back their shares if there is no successful IPO. But, that will hardly compensate them for the risks and likely costs.
Any proposed domestic IPO in China must gain the approvalÂ of Chinaâ€™s CSRC. Even for strong companies, without the legacy of a failed US listing, have a low percentage chance of getting approval. No one knows the exact numbers, but itâ€™s likely last year and this, over 2,000 companies applied for a domestic IPO in China. About 10%-15% of these will succeed. The slightest taint is usually enough to convince the CSRC to reject an application. The taint on these â€œtaken privateâ€ Chinese companies will be more than slight. If thereâ€™s no certain China IPO, then the whole economic rationale of these â€œtake privateâ€ deals is very suspect.Â The Chinese company will be then be delisted in the US, and un-listable in China. This will give new meaning to the term â€œfinancial purgatoryâ€, privatized Chinese companies without a prayer of ever having tradeable shares again.
Plus, even if they did manage to get CSRC approval, will Chinese retail investors really stampede to buy, at a huge markup, shares of a company that US investors disparaged? I doubt it. How about Hong Kong? Itâ€™s not likely their investors will be much more keen on this shopworn US merchandise. Plus, these days, most Chinese company looking for a Hong Kong IPO needs net profits of $50mn and up. These OTCBB and reverse merger victims will rarely, if ever, be that large, even after a few years of spending PE money to expand.
Against all these very real risks, the PE firms can point to what? That valuations are much lower for these OTCBB and reverse merger companies in the US than comparables in China. True. For good reason. The China-quoted comps donâ€™t have bosses foolish or reckless enough to waste a million bucks to do a backdoor listing in the US, and then end up with shares that barely trade, even at a pathetic valuation. Who would you rather trust your money to?