Over the last thirty years, China has gone from a country where just about all companies were state-owned enterprises (so-called â€œSOEsâ€) to one where now fewer than 30% are. Much of the dynamism in Chinaâ€™s domestic economy comes from these newer private companies. There are some very strong SOEs dominating key sectors of Chinaâ€™s economy, including China Mobile, Sinopec, ICBC and other large banks, as well as airlines and utilities. These companies have also been partially privatized by selling minority stakes on global stock markets. This has provided huge amounts of new capital and brought with it improved performance and corporate governance at these top SOEs.
But, many SOEs have failed, while others languish with inefficient production, overstaffing and outmoded products. For many of these, the prognosis is not good. But, at the same time, there is a entrepreneurial transformation getting underway at some of these SOEs. Managers are beginning to act more like owners and less like civil servants. We are seeing this now in our work. Some of the most interesting companies weâ€™re talking to are SOEs eager to bring in outside capital as a first step towards privatization, and subsidiaries of larger SOEs looking for ways to split themselves off from their parent and go public independently.
I expect to see more and more private capital, particularly from private equity firms, going into SOEs. In some cases, the investors will find ways to take majority control. In others, they will link their minority investment to a corporate restructuring that gives the SOEs management equity, warrants, or other incentives to improve performance and profitability.
The likely result: some of Chinaâ€™s more tired SOEs are going to get a big dose of free market adrenalin. At the moment, there are lots of legal hurdles for private capital to enter into an SOE. The process is opaque. Weâ€™re spending a fair bit of time on behalf of several SOEs trying to figure out workable legal mechanisms. To succeed, any deal will take time and need champions in higher levels of government. But, practical economic policies tend to triumph in China. Private capital is, without question, the best option to improve the profitability and future prospects of many SOEs. This is good for employment, good for economic growth, good for worker incomes, good for accelerating development in inland China. These are all core policy goals in China.
Iâ€™m not able to discuss details or provide company names, but I can give an outline of several of the most interesting SOE transactions we are now working on. This should give a sense of the kind of changes that may be on the way for SOEs.
In one case, a subsidiary of one of Chinaâ€™s largest publicly-traded SOE construction holding companies is looking for ways, with the parent companyâ€™s encouragement, to spin itself off, raise private equity capital, and then try for an IPO. Though it contributes only about 5% of the parent companyâ€™s total revenues and operates in different markets than the parent, this subsidiary is one of the largest, most successful companies in its industry in China. Its profits this year should exceed Rmb 650mn (USD$100mn).
Because the parent company is already public, this subsidiary needs to fight for capital with other larger sister companies inside the conglomerate. It usually comes up short. With access to new capital, the subsidiaryâ€™s current managers are confident they could double the size of the business (both profits and revenues) within two to three years.Â Outside of China, spinning off a subsidiary or selling a minority stake in an IPO is a fairly straight-forward process. Not so in China.
Under current rules, the CSRC, Chinaâ€™s stock market regulator, will not allow the parent simply to spin off the subsidiary through an IPO. There are related party transactions and deconsolidation issues.Â So, we are looking at ways for a large strategic investor to buy a controlling stake in the subsidiary, then pour in as much as $250mn in new capital. The subsidiary will then build up its business to where it could either qualify for an IPO three to five years later, or the PE firm would exit by selling its stakeÂ back to the parent.
The management of this subsidiary are quite keen to put in their own money and become shareholders if their business can be separated and put on a path to IPO. They have done a very solid job building the business to its current scale, and would likely do markedly better if they had a real stake in the performance of the company.
In another deal we are working on, a chemical company now majority owned by Sinopec is bringing in new capital to buy the Sinopec shares and recapitalize the business. The company was started seven years ago by a private entrepreneur, who raised the original capital from Sinopec. The entrepreneur now controls about 40% of the companyâ€™s equity. Through the deal weâ€™re working on, he will become the majority owner and the private equity investor will own the rest.
Weâ€™re also in discussions with the international division of one of Chinaâ€™s giant SOE electricity companies. This group already has sizable projects and revenues in Southeast Asia and Russia, where it built and operates large hydro and gas-fueled power plants. The international division, however, is being held back by high debt levels at the SOE parent. This means the international division has trouble borrowing enough to finance its continued growth. Since the international division is already structured legally as a Hong Kong company, it should be possible for it to raise private equity then IPO in Hong Kong. We think this division can raise as much as USD$500mn in the next three years, both in private equity and IPO.
These three (the construction subsidiary, the chemical company and international power plant business) are all very solid businesses that outside investors will likely flock to. Weâ€™re also trying to find a way to help a more troubled smaller SOE based in central China. They make certain types of special fiberglass. The core business is fundamentally sound, but is stuck also doing some other things that lose money.Â It is too small now to qualify for an IPO, and is having a hard time in the current environment increasing its bank borrowing. The existing managers are eager to have an outside private equity investor come in and not only provide the capital, but also help improve manufacturing efficiency and marketing, and chop away the loss-making parts. They think an investment of Rmb 50mn could increase profits by a similar amount within two years.
As anyone with experience will tell you, working with SOEs can be a complicated and time-consuming process, particularly compared to dealing with a company founded and run by a private entrepreneur. While weâ€™re fortunate to have strong entrepreneur-led companies as clients, I also quite enjoy working on these SOE transactions. It affords an up-close view of the way SOEs operate and problem-solve. Iâ€™m also getting to participate, in a small way, in perhaps the most significant transformation now taking place in Chinaâ€™s economy. With new capital and perhaps new ownership structures, SOEs are going to thrive as never before. Their greater efficiency and greater profits will be a challenge for the private sector, but overall will be a plus for China.
1 thought on “Teaching the Elephant to Dance â€“ Chinaâ€™s SOEs Transform”
Very insightful article.
It is amazing to see how these big, lumbering, inefficient, waste producing bureaucratic SOEs transform themselves over the last 10 years into some of the very well run profit machines.
For as far as one can think, SOEs will be an important part if not critical part of the Chinese economy. Flush with capital and looking for opportunities, meantime many of the great European businesses are going through some tough time, one can just imagine the SOEs and other Chinese local firms will be picking up a lot of the good European brand names that are facing difficulties in the coming years, and that probably will help pull Euro Zone out of its crisis.
The concerns are what kind of negative impact the big monopoly SOEs, like Sino-Pec, Petro China, etc. have on fair market competition and on innovations. What kind of examples they are setting for other fledgling businesses.
Interestingly, in transforming into more competitive enterprises, the SOEs need help from Western talents. And, in the process Western talents are helping to build SOEs into strong competitors of the businesses back home. Such is market economy.